Opinion Article
01/11/2020
The fallacy of the reformist left on the Iranian Ayatollah being in an opposite camp to the US
Altamira of the Tendency of PO and Albamonte of the PTS want to make us believe that Russia, China and the Shiite Clerics of Iran are a military and political camp opposed to the US and NATO, and that this clash would define all the political events and wars in the Maghreb and the Middle East. Can they say, without feeling ashamed, which has been the military clash between these two political camps?
In Syria, Turkey downed a plane to Russia. Later it apologized and the murderers Erdogan and Putin went to make oil business deals together in Caucasus. In the middle, there were 15 million refugees and 600 thousand killed with which the Syrian revolution was crushed… ISIS also went there for that…
USA took 100% of the Syrian oil occupying Raqa and Deir ez Zor. Where are the military clashes between them?
Iraq is a US protectorate. The Yemeni revolution was largely bombed by Saudi Arabia.
What about Iran? A peace negotiator.
Stop bothering and lying! The history of humanity is the history of class struggle. What are the military clashes in the Middle East about? The oppressors and their “rival” political camps are united to crush the uprising of the masses! From time to time, the boss of the murderers and killers disciplines his agents as the president of a company do to the rogue managers. Just that.
Being tied to the apron strings of the fascist Iranian clerics places the reformist left in the political camp that crushes the same toiling masses that fight against the former in Iran and Iraq. Millions take to the streets at the war cry “Neither US nor Iran!” Those workers fighting for millions in Iraq have a million times more strategic clarity than these pseudo Marxists that poison the workers of the world with bourgeois ideology.
Lies have no legs, and cheaters don't prosper. Reality condemns you, Messrs.
Iván León |
